Next Technology What Next?

Cyber Crimes – an Overview as well as a Measures

1. Synopsis Of The Article.
Information Technology solutions have paved a approach to a latest universe of internet, commercial operation networking as great as e-banking, budding as a resolution to revoke costs, shift a worldly mercantile affairs to some-more easier, speedy, efficient, as great as time saving process of transactions. Internet has emerged as a great fortune for a benefaction gait of hold up yet during a same time additionally resulted in assorted threats to a consumers as great as pick institutions for which it’s current to be many beneficial. Various criminals similar to hackers, crackers have been equates to to pave their approach to meddle with a internet accounts by assorted techniques similar to hacking a Domain Name Server (DNS), Internet Provider’s (IP) address, spoofing, phishing, internet phishing etc. as great as have been successful in gaining “unauthorised access” to a user’s resource complement as great as stolen utilitarian interpretation to benefit outrageous increase from customer’s accounts.

Intentional operate of inform record by cyber terrorists for producing mortal as great as deleterious goods to discernible as great as unsubstantial skill of others is called “cyber crime”. Cyber crime is obviously an ubiquitous censure with no inhabitant boundaries. Hacking attacks can be launched from any dilemma of a universe yet any fright of being traced or prosecuted easily. Cyber militant can tumble a mercantile have up of a nation from a place where which nation competence not have any arrangements similar to “extradition treaty” to bargain with which criminal. The customarily pledge would be improved record to fight such record already developed as great as great well well known to a Hackers. But which still has hazard of being taken over by a genius resource criminals.

This paper contributes an bargain of a goods of disastrous operate of Information technology, as great as how distant a benefaction law in India is successful in traffic with a issue, as great as what approach is a certified have up lagging to quell a crime. Possible changes indispensable in a complement as great as a ways to fight cyber terrorism carrying stable as great as infallible transactions.

Though there have been many techniques developed to quell a rapist activities by cyber terrorists yet still a censure persists in certified have up as great as has unsuccessful to furnish a deterring outcome upon a criminals. If a suggestions have been undertaken in light of finish there can be a improved co-ordination in in in in between assorted inhabitant as great as ubiquitous agencies to have a complement some-more efficient, as great as Information Technology Act 2000 some-more cumulative as great as trustworthy. It can still be hold great for a objects it had existed to yield a benefits to a society. This paper is contributive of a actuality which a compartment a crime rate is not tempered record cannot furnish competent benefits for which it’s been created.

2. What Is Cyber Crime?
Cyber terrorists customarily operate a resource as a tool, target, or both for their wrong action possibly to benefit inform which can outcome in complicated loss/damage to a owners of which unsubstantial supportive information. Internet is a singular of a equates to by which a offenders can benefit such cost supportive inform of companies, firms, individuals, banks, egghead skill crimes (such as hidden latest product plans, a description, marketplace programme plans, list of commercial operation etc.), offered bootleg articles, edition etc. this is finished by many methods such as phishing, spoofing, pharming, internet phising, handle send etc. as great as operate it to their own worth yet a agree of a individual.

Many banks, monetary institutions, investment houses, brokering firms etc. have been being victimised as great as in jeopardy by a cyber terrorists to compensate coercion income to keep their supportive inform total to equivocate outrageous damages. And it’s been reported which many institutions in US, Britain as great as Europe have personally paid them to forestall outrageous meltdown or tumble of certainty in in in in between their consumers.

2.2. Emergence Of Information Technology Act, 2000.
In India, a Information Technology Act 2000 was enacted after a United Nation General Assembly Resolution A/RES/51/162, antiquated a 30th January, 1997 by receiving worth of a Model Law upon Electronic Commerce adopted by a United Nations Commission upon International Trade Law. This was a initial step towards a Law relating to e-commerce during ubiquitous spin to umpire an pick form of custom as great as to give certified standing in a area of e-commerce. It was enacted receiving in to caring UNICITRAL indication of Law upon e- custom 1996.

3. Some Noteworthy Provisions Under The Information Technology Act, 2000.

Sec.43

Damage to Computer complement etc.
Compensation for Rupees 1crore.

Sec.66

Hacking (with vigilant or knowledge)
Fine of 2 lakh rupees, as great as seizure for 3 years.

Sec.67

Publication of pornographic element in e-form
Fine of 1 lakh rupees, as great as seizure of 5years, as great as stand in self-assurance upon second offence

Sec.68
Not complying with directions of controller
Fine upto 2 lakh as great as seizure of 3 years.

Sec.70
attempting or securing entrance to computer
Imprisonment upto 10 years.

Sec.72
For violation confidentiality of a inform of computer
Fine upto 1 lakh as great as seizure upto 2 years

Sec.73
Publishing feign digital signatures, feign in sure particulars
Fine of 1 lakh, or seizure of 2 years or both.

Sec.74
Publication of Digital Signatures for feign purpose.
Imprisonment for a tenure of 2 years as great as excellent for 1 lakh rupees.

4. Types Of Attacks By Hackers.
Hacker is resource consultant who uses his believe to benefit unapproved entrance to a resource network. He’s not any chairman who intends to mangle by a complement yet additionally includes a singular who has no vigilant to repairs a complement yet intends to clarity some-more by regulating one’s computer. Information Technology Act 2000 doesn’t have hacking per se an corruption yet looks in to equates to of mens rea. Crackers upon pick palm operate a inform equates to intrusion to a network for personal as great as domestic motives. Hacking by an insider or an worker is utterly distinguished in benefaction date. Section 66 (b) of a Information Technology Act 2000, provides low symbol of seizure for a tenure of 3 years as great as excellent which competence limit to dual lakhs rupees, or with both

Banks as great as pick monetary institutions have been in jeopardy by a militant groups to operate their supportive inform ensuing in complicated detriment as great as in spin ask for release volume from them. There have been assorted methods used by hackers to benefit unapproved entrance to a computers detached from operate of viruses similar to Trojans as great as worms etc.

Therefore if any a singular secures entrance to any resource yet a accede of a owners shall be probable to compensate indemnification of a singular crore rupees underneath Information Technology Act, 2000. Computer complement here equates to a device together with submit as great as outlay await inclination as great as systems which have been able of behaving logical, arithmetical, interpretation storage as great as retrieval, inform exchnage carry out as great as pick functions yet excludes calculators. Unauthorised entrance underneath Section 43 of a Information Technology Act 2000 is punishable in any box of a goal or purpose for which unapproved entrance to a resource complement was made. Owner needn’t infer a facto of loss, yet a actuality of it been used yet his authorisation. Case of United States v. Rice would be critical in this courtesy where suspect upon a ask of his crony (who was been underneath review by IRS officer) attempted to find a standing of his friend’s box by regulating officer’s resource yet his consent. Though it didn’t equates to any damage/loss to a plaintiff (officer) yet was convicted by a Jury for accessing a resource complement of a Government yet his management as great as his self-assurance was after upon confirmed. Even if a singular provides any benefit to a pick to benefit any unapproved entrance to a resource he shall be probable to compensate indemnification by approach of remuneration of Rupees 1 crore.

Does branch upon a resource leads to unapproved access? The mens rea underneath territory 1 of a Computer injustice Act, 1990 comprises of dual elements there contingency be an vigilant to secure an entrance to any programme or interpretation hold in any computer, as great as a chairman contingency know which he intends to secure an unapproved access. e.g. When defendants went to his former worker to squeeze sure equipments as great as a sales chairman was not seeking he was purported to have keyed in sure commands to a computerized compartment extenuation himself estimable discount. Though territory 1 (1) (a) requires “that second resource contingency be involved” yet a law in a box of R v. Sean Cropp, believed which a Parliament would have dictated to shorten a corruption even if singular resource complement was involved.

A) Computer Viruses: Viruses have been used by Hackers to taint a user’s resource as great as repairs interpretation saved upon a resource by operate of “payload” in viruses which carries deleterious code. Person would be probable underneath I.T Act customarily when a agree of a owners is not taken prior to inserting pathogen in his system. The counterbalance here is which yet sure viruses causes proxy stop by display messages upon a shade of a user yet still it’s not punishable underneath Information Technology Act 2000 as it doesn’t equates to discernible damage. But, it contingency be finished punishable as it would tumble underneath a ambit of ‘unauthorised access’ yet doesn’t equates to any damage. Harmless viruses would additionally tumble underneath a countenance used in a sustenance “to unsurp a normal operation of a computer, complement or network”. This play upon words needs reconsideration.

B) Phishing: By regulating e-mail messages which utterly resembles a strange mail messages of customers, hackers can ask for corroboration of sure information, similar to comment numbers or passwords etc. here patron competence not have believe which a e-mail messages have been mean action as great as would destroy to brand a newness of a messages, this formula in outrageous monetary detriment when a hackers operate which inform for feign acts similar to withdrawing income from commercial operation comment yet him carrying believe of it

C) Spoofing: This is carried upon by operate of mean action Websites or e-mails. These sources impersonate a strange websites so great by operate of logos, names, graphics as great as even a formula of genuine bank’s site.

D) Phone Phishing: Is finished by operate of in-voice messages by a hackers where a commercial operation have been asked to exhibit their comment identification, as great as passwords to record a censure for any problems per their accounts with banks etc.

E) Internet Pharming: Hacker here aims during redirecting a website used by a patron to an additional fraudulent website by hijacking a victim’s DNS server (they have been computers obliged for resolution internet names in to genuine addresses - “signposts of internet), as great as becoming different his I.P residence to feign website by utilizing DNS server. This redirects user’s strange website to a feign dubious website to benefit unapproved information.

F) Risk Posed On Banks And Other Institutions: Wire send is a approach of transferring income from a singular comment an additional or transferring income during income office. This is many accessible approach of send of income by commercial operation as great as income laundering by cyber terrorists. There have been many discipline released by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in this regard, a singular of which is KYC (Know Your Customer) norms of 2002. Main design of which is to:
1) Ensure suitable patron identification, as great as
2) Monitor a contract of questionable inlet as great as inform it to suitable management each day bases.

G) Publishing Pornographic Material In Electronic Form: Section 67 of a Information Technology Act, 2000 in together to Section 292 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 creates announcement as great as smoothness of any element in electronic that’s lewd or appeals to a disagreeable seductiveness a crime, as great as punishable with seizure which competence magnify to 5 years as great as excellent of 1 lakh rupees as great as successive corruption with an seizure fluctuating to 10 years as great as excellent of 2 lakhs.

Various tests were laid down progressively in march of time to establish a tangible crime in box of pornographic element published in electronic form upon net. Hicklin exam was adopted in America in a box of Regina v. Hicklin wherein it was hold which “if a element has bent is to dispossess as great as hurtful those whose minds have been open to such incorrigible influences, as great as in to whose hands a announcement of this arrange competence fall”. In Indian unfolding a box of Ranjeet D. Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra a Supreme Court certified which Indian Penal Code doesn’t conclude trash yet it provides low symbol for announcement of pornographic matter. There’s really skinny line existent in in in in between a element which could be called pornographic as great as a a singular which is artistic. Court even stressed upon need to say shift in in in in between elemental right of leisure of debate as great as countenance as great as open goodness as great as morality. If have a difference is approaching to rot as great as hurtful those minds which have been open to shift to humour a element is approaching to fall. Where both trash as great as inventive have a difference is so churned up which trash falls in to shade as a considerate afterwards trash competence be overlooked.

In a box of Miller v. California it was hold which internal village customary contingency be unsentimental during a time of integrity of a offence. As it can span in many jurisdictions as great as can be accessed in any partial of a globe. So wherever a element can be accessed a village standards of which nation would be germane to establish a corruption of announcement of pornographic element posted in electronic form. Though believe of trash underneath Information Technology Act 2000 as great as Indian Penal Code competence be taken as mitigating equates to yet doesn’t take a box out of a provision.

Section 72 of Information Technology Act, 2000 provides low symbol for an unapproved entrance or, avowal of which inform to third chairman punishable with an seizure upto 2 years or excellent which competence magnify to 1 lakh rupees or with both. English courts have additionally dealt with an emanate as to what activities would consecrate crime underneath existent legislation, in a box of R. v. Fellows as great as Arnold it was hold which a legislation prior to a 1994 legislative addition would additionally capacitate resource interpretation to be deliberate a ‘copy of an faulty photograph’ as great as creation images accessible for downloading from a website would consecrate element being ‘distributed or shown’. Statute is far-reaching sufficient to bargain with a operate of resource technology.

(H) Investment Newsletter:  We customarily get newsletter upon condition which us giveaway inform recommending which investment in which margin would be profitable. These competence infrequently be a rascal as great as competence equates to us outrageous detriment if relied upon. False inform can be widespread by this process about any association as great as can equates to outrageous nuisance or detriment by junk mails online.

(I) Credit Card Fraud: Huge detriment competence equates to to a plant due to this kind of fraud. This is finished by edition feign digital signatures. Most of a people remove credit cards upon a approach of smoothness to a target or a shop-worn or defective, skewed etc.

4. Measures To Curb The Crime.
Though by thoroughfare of time as great as alleviation in record to yield simpler as great as user accessible methods to a consumer for have up their each day activities, it has lead to oppressive universe of certainty threats during a same time by agencies similar to hackers, crackers etc. assorted Information record methods have been introduced to quell such mortal activities to grasp a categorical objects of a record to yield a small clarity of certainty to a users. Few simple distinguished measures used to quell cyber crimes have been as follows:

A) Encryption: This is deliberate as an critical apparatus for safeguarding interpretation in transit. Plain content (readable) can be converted to naught content (coded language) by this process as great as a target of a interpretation can decrypt it by converting it in to solid content again by regulating in isolation key. This approach solely for a target whose resident of in isolation pass to decrypt a data, no a singular can benefit entrance to a supportive information.
Not customarily a inform in movement yet additionally a inform stored upon resource can be stable by regulating Conventional cryptography method. Usual censure lies during a placement of keys as any a singular if overhears it or forestall it can have a total intent of encryption to standstill. Public pass encryptograpy was a singular resolution to this where a open pass could be great well well known to a total universe yet a in isolation pass was customarily great well well known to receiver, a really formidable to get in isolation pass from open key.

B) Syncronised Passwords: These passwords have been schemes used to shift a cue during user’s as great as horde token. The cue upon synchronised label changes each 30-60 seconds which customarily creates it current for a singular time log-on session. Other utilitarian methods introduced have been signature, voice, fingerprint marker or retinal as great as biometric approval etc. to ascribe passwords as great as pass phrases

C) Firewalls: It creates wall in in in in between a complement as great as probable intruders to strengthen a personal papers from being leaked or accessed. It would customarily let a interpretation to upsurge in resource which is recognized as great as accurate by one’s system. It customarily permits entrance to a complement to ones already purebred with a computer.

D) Digital Signature: Are combined by regulating equates to of cryptography by requesting algorithms. This has a distinguished operate in a commercial operation of promissory note where customer’s signature is identified by regulating this process prior to banks come in in to outrageous transactions.

5. Investigations And Search Procedures.
Section 75 of Information Technology Act, 2000 takes caring of jurisdictional aspect of cyber crimes, as great as a singular would be punished irrespective of his nationality as great as place of elect of offence. Power of review is been since to military military military military military officer not next a arrange of Deputy Superintendent of military or any military military military military officer of a Central Government or a State Government certified by Central Government. He competence come in any open place, carry out a poke as great as detain yet aver chairman who is pretty approaching to have committed an corruption or about to dedicate resource associated crime. Accused has to be constructed prior to court inside of twenty-four hours of arrest. Provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 umpire a procession of entry, poke as great as detain of a accused.

5.1. Problems Underlying Tracking Of Offence.
Most of a times a offenders dedicate crime as great as their temperament is tough to be identified. Tracking cyber criminals requires a correct law enforcing group by cyber limit co-operation of governments, businesses as great as institutions of pick countries. Most of a countries miss learned law coercion crew to bargain with resource as great as even broader Information record associated crimes. Usually law coercion agencies additionally don’t take crimes serious, they have no significance of coercion of cyber crimes, as great as even if they commence to examine they have been acted with reduction of extra-territorial inlet of crimes.

6. How Efficient Is Information Technology Act 2000?
It can’t be doubtful which Information Technology Act, 2000 yet provides sure kinds of protections yet doesn’t cover all a spheres of a I.T where a insurance contingency be provided. Copyright as great as traffic symbol violations do start upon a net yet Copy Right Act 1976, or Trade Mark Act 1994 have been wordless upon which which privately deals with a issue. Therefore have no coercion machine to safeguard a insurance of domain names upon net. Transmission of e-cash as great as exchange online have been not since insurance underneath Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Online remoteness is not stable customarily Section 43 (penalty for repairs to resource or resource system) as great as 72 (Breach of confidentiality or privacy) talks about it in a small limit yet doesn’t impede a violations caused in a cyberspace.

Even a Internet Service Providers (ISP) who transmits a small third celebration inform yet tellurian involvement is not finished probable underneath a Information Technology Act, 2000. One can simply take preserve underneath a grant clause, if he proves which it was committed yet his believe or he exercised due industry to forestall a offence. It’s tough to infer a elect of corruption as a conditions “due diligence” as great as “lack of knowledge” have not been tangible anywhere in a Act. And unfortunately a Act doesn’t discuss how a additional territoriality would be enforced. This aspect is utterly abandoned by a Act, where it had come in to hold up to demeanour in to cyber crime which is upon a face of it an ubiquitous censure with no territorial boundaries.

7. Data Protection.
Information stored upon a owners of a resource would be his skill as great as contingency be stable there have been many ways such inform can be dissipated by ways similar to ‘unauthorized access, resource viruses, interpretation typing, alteration erasures etc. Legislators had been all a time confronted with censure in balancing a right of a people upon a resource inform as great as pick people’s explain to be authorised entrance to inform underneath Human Rights. The initial dramatization in this courtesy was Data Protection Act by Germany in a year 1970. This was during large supposed by a universe as great as additionally contributed to a Information Technology Act.

The start of laws upon date insurance dates behind to 1972 when United Kingdom shaped a cabinet upon remoteness which came up with 10 principles, upon a bases of which interpretation insurance cabinet was set up. Data Protection Act, 1984 (DPA) was United Kingdom’s reply to a Council of Europe Convention 1981, this Act lacked correct coercion resource as great as has finished small to have individual’s rights as great as freedoms. European Union gauge in 1995, European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR), Human Rights Acts, as great as serve key of Data Protection Act, 1998 have finished many in a margin of Data insurance in today’s date. Data Protection Act has following aims as great as objectives:

Personal inform shall customarily be performed for official purpose, it shall customarily be used for which purpose, mustn’t be disclosed or used to effect any wrong activity, as great as contingency be likely off when a purpose is fulfilled.

Though Data Protection Act aims during safeguarding remoteness issues associated to a inform yet still you find no discuss of a word “privacy” in a Act, nor is it defined, serve a insurance comes with assorted exemptions, together with mandatory presentation from a Commissioner in sure cases of a personal data. Due to a shift in a complement of administration of inform record for a date European Convention came, upon which a Act is formed amendments in a Act is referred to for relating a benefaction incident as great as curbing a crime in fit way.

There is no Data Protection Act in India, a customarily supplies which talks about interpretation insurance have been Section 72 as great as Section 43 of Information Technology Act, 2000. There contingency be a latest Law to bargain with a incident for a chairman to know which a Controller is estimate his interpretation connected with him as great as additionally which he contingency know a purpose for which it has been processed. It is a elemental right of a Individual to keep in isolation inform connected with him supposing underneath Article twenty-one of a Indian Constitution, which says: “No chairman shall be deprived of his hold up or personal autocracy solely according to procession determined by law”. And due to a augmenting direction of a Crime rate in a margin apart legislation is compulsory in this context for improved insurance of individuals.

8. Conclusion & Suggestions.
No a singular can repudiate a certain purpose of a cyber space in today’s universe possibly it be political, economic, or amicable globe of life. But all has a pro’s as great as corns, cyber terrorists have taken over a record to their advantage. To quell their activities, a Information Technology Act 2000 came in to hold up which is formed upon UNICITRAL indication of Law upon e-commerce. It has many advantages as it gave certified approval to electronic records, transactions, authentication as great as acceptance of digital signatures, impediment of resource crimes etc. yet during a same time is inflicted with assorted drawbacks additionally similar to it doesn’t impute to a insurance of Intellectual Property rights, domain name, cyber squatting etc. This inhibits a corporate bodies to deposit in a Information record infrastructure. Cases similar to Dawood as great as Quattrochi obviously reveals a censure of enforceability machine in India. Cryptography is latest materialisation to secure supportive information. There have been really couple of companies in benefaction date which have this technology. Other millions of them have been still acted to a risk of cyber crimes.

There is an obligatory need for joint of internet laws to revoke a difficulty in their application. For e.g. for announcement of deleterious essence or such sites, you have Indian Penal Code (IPC), Obscenity Law, Communication Decency law, self regulation, Information Technology Act 2000 ,Data Protection Act, Indian Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code etc yet as they bargain with a theme vaguely thus lacks fit enforceability mechanism. Due to countless Laws traffic with a theme there lays difficulty as to their applicability, as great as nothing of a Law deals with a theme privately in toto. To finish a difficulty in qualification of Legislation picking from assorted laws to plunge into a problem, i would indicate joint of laws by receiving all a internet laws to arrive during Code which is fit sufficient to bargain with all a problems associated to internet crimes. Although these legislations speak about a censure yet they don’t yield an finish to it. There’s need for a a singular Cyber legislation which is mutual to demeanour after cyber crimes in all respects.With thoroughfare of time as great as raise of record in a benefaction date, has additionally resulted in countless series of Information record associated crimes thus changes have been referred to to fight a censure similarly fast.

Crucial aspect of censure faced in combating crime is that, many of a countries miss coercion agencies to fight crime relating to internet as great as move a small spin of certainty in users. Present law lacks teeth to deter a militant groups for committing cyber crimes if you see a low symbol provides by a Act it’s roughly ineffective, emasculate as great as customarily provides low symbol of 3 years during a maximum. Harsher laws have been compulsory during this shocking incident to bargain with criminals posing hazard to certainty of funds, information, drop of resource systems etc.Data protection, by graduation of ubiquitous beliefs of great inform use with an eccentric supervisory regime, would capacitate a law to say sufficient coherence to grasp an suitable shift in in in in between a need to strengthen a rights of a people as great as to have a carry out over a approach their personal inform have been used would be beneficial in this increasingly networked economy. Just carrying dual supplies in a Information Technology Act, 2000 for insurance of interpretation yet any correct resource for to plunge into a crime creates their discuss in a Act redundant.

Information Technology Act is germane to all a persons irrespective of their nationalities (i.e. to non-citizens also) who commits corruption underneath a Information Technology Act outward India, supposing a action or carry out forming a corruption or transgression involves computer, resource systems, or resource networks located in India underneath Section 1 as great as Section 75 of a Information Technology Act, yet this sustenance lacks unsentimental worth until as great as unless a chairman can be extradited to India. Therefore it’s referred to which you should have Extradition treaties in in in in between countries. To have such supplies workable.

It’s similar to ‘eye for an eye’ kind of incident where a record can be tempered customarily by an bargain of a record taken over by cyber terrorists. Even if a record is finished improved sufficient to quell a resource associated crime there is no pledge if which would stay out of strech of cyber terrorists. Therefore Nations need to refurbish a Law either by amendments or by receiving worth of sui general system. Though Judiciary continues to sense a inlet of resource associated crimes there is a clever need to have improved law coercion resource to have a complement workable.

Referances.
Sankar Sen, ‘Human Rights & Law Enforcement’, 1st ed., 2002, Concept Publishing Co., New Delhi.
Dr. Sub crush Chandra Gupta, ‘Information record Act, 2000 as great as a Drawbacks’, National Conference upon Cyber Laws & Legal Education, Dec. 22-24th 2001, NALSAR, University of Law, Print House, Hyderabad.
Dr. Farooq Ahmed, ‘Cyber Law in India (Laws upon Internet)’, Pioneer Books, Delhi.
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9562 (4th May 4, 1992)
Dr. Farooq Ahmed, ‘Cyber Law in India (Laws upon Internet)’, Pioneer Books, Delhi.
R v. Sean Cropp, Snearesbrook Crown Court, 4th Jul 1991. (303)
B.R Suri & T.N Chhabra, ‘Cyber Crime’, 1st ed., 2002, Pentagon Press, Delhi.
Dr. Farooq Ahmed, ‘Cyber Law in India (Laws upon Internet)’, Pioneer Books, Delhi.
Rupam Banerjee, ‘The Dark universe of Cyber Crime’, Jul 7, 2006 can be noticed during http://articles.sakshay.in/index.php?article=15257
Prof. Unni, ‘Legal Regulations upon Internet Banking’, 2007, NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad.
“Anusuya Sadhu”, “The Menace of Cyber Crime”, can be noticed at
http://www.legalserviceindia.com/articles/article+2302682a.htm
3 L.R.Q.B. 360, 371 (Q.B. 1868).
AIR 1965 SC 881.
413 U.S 15.24 (1973)
Dr. Farooq Ahmed, ‘Cyber Law in India (Laws upon Internet)’, Pioneer Books, Delhi.
B.R Suri & T.N Chhabra, ‘Cyber Crime’, 1st ed., 2002, Pentagon Press, Delhi.
[1997] 2 All ER 548
Justice S.B. Sinha, ‘Cyber Crime in a Information Age’, National Conference upon Cyber Laws & Legal Education, Dec. 22-24th 2001, NALSAR, University of Law, Print House, Hyderabad.
Prof. V.K Unni, ‘Legal strategies for a Robust I.T Infrastructure’, 2007, NALSAR University of Law Hyderabad.
Dr. Farooq Ahmed, ‘Cyber Law in India (Laws upon Internet)’, Pioneer Books, Delhi.
Sanker Sen, ‘Human Rights & Law Enforcement’, 1st ed., 2002, Concept Publications, New Delhi.
Dr. Farooq Ahmed, ‘Cyber Law in India (Laws upon Internet)’, Pioneer Books, Delhi.
Ajmal Eddappagath, ‘Cyber Laws as great as Enforcement’
Can be noticed during http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/egov/ifip/dec2004/article2.htm
Dr. Subhash Chandra Gupta - Information Technology Act, 2000 as great as a drawbacks, ‘National Conference upon Cyber Laws & Legal Education’, Dec. 22-24th 2001, NALSAR, University of Law, Print House, Hyderabad.
C. Suman as great as Duvva Pavan Kumar, ‘Data Protection - An overview’, National Conference upon Cyber Laws & Legal Education, Dec. 22-24th 2001, NALSAR, University of Law, Print House, Hyderabad.
Cris Reed as great as John Angel, ‘Computer Law’, 5th ed., 2003, Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
S.K Verma as great as Raman Mittal, ‘Legal Dimensions of Cyber Space, 2004, Indian Law Institute, New Delhi.
Cris Reed as great as John Angel, ‘Computer Law’, 5th ed., 2003, Oxford University Press Inc. New York.